18-Title: Feeding and resting behaviour of lactating Kankrej cows under different housing systems
Authors: HD Chauhan, HA Patel and BH Priyadarshi
Source: Ruminant Science (2012)-1(2):173-176.
How to cite this manuscript: Chauhan HD, Patel HA and Priyadarshi BH (2012). Feeding and resting behaviour of lactating Kankrej cows under different housing systems. Ruminant Science 1(2):173-176.
Feeding and resting behaviour of lactating Kankrej cows was noted under three housing systems, viz. First group was provided RCC shed (T1), second group was kept under Thatched roof (T2) and third group was provided Tree shelter (T3). Fodder eating time was significantly (P<0.01) higher under T1 (292.15±4.32 min). Significantly higher feeding activity was observed in day time as compared to night in all treatments. In summer season standing idle time was significantly (P<0.05) higher under T1 (299.34±3.15 min). Sitting lying ruminating time was significantly higher in T3 (278.93±2.09 min) in summer season as compared to T1 (233.20±2.13 min) and T2 (219.5±2.14 min), while in monsoon and winter season, it was significantly higher in T1 (270.30±2.11 and 259.10±3.26 min, respectively). Sleeping pattern in all the seasons did not differ significantly between treatments. However, it was significantly (P<0.05) higher in night as compared to day. Frequencies of defecation and urination did not differ due to treatments but was significantly higher in day. Feeding temperament score was not affected by seasons or treatments.
Johnson HD, Ragsdale AC, Berry IL and Shanklin MD (1963). Temperature-humidity effects including influence of acclimation in feed and water consumption of Holstein cattle. Missouri Agricultural Experimental Station. Research Bulletin 846 (c.f.: Indian Dairyman (2006). 58(4): 60).
Kataktalware MA (2004). Studies on production performance, behaviour and physiological parameters of crossbred dairy cattle under different shelter management systems. PhD thesis submitted to NDRI Karnal, Haryana.
Kotwas R and Vavak V (1979). Study of dairy cow ethology under large commercial farm condition. Pol’nohospodarstvo 25(8):668-676.
Razdan MN (1965). Studies on physiological reactions of dairy cattle under different environmental conditions. PhD thesis submitted to University of Calcutta, Calcutta, India.
Regina Vasilators and Wangsness Pant J (1980). Feeding behaviour of lactating dairy cows as measured by time lapse photography. Journal of Dairy Science 63:412.
Schake LM and Riggs JK (1969). Activities of lactating beef cows in confinement. Journal of Animal Science 28:568.
Sharma P (1999). Production performance and behaviour studies on dairy cattle under different shelters. PhD thesis submitted to NDRI Karnal (Haryana).
Snedecor GW and Cochran WG (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn, Oxford and IBH Publication Co Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
Varlyakov I, Tossev A, Unshelm J, Rultten G Van, Zeeb K and Ekesbo I (1988). Behaviour of cows managed loosely in half open sheds. Proceeding of International Conference on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals, Skara, 324-330.
Yadav BL (1981). Effect of housing and feeding systems on the milk yield, milk composition and physiological reactions of Murrah buffaloes during rainy season. MSc thesis submitted to HAU Hisar, Haryana.