Comparative evaluation of acrosomal integrity of bull spermatozoa by two staining techniques

Comparative evaluation of acrosomal integrity of bull spermatozoa by two staining techniques

Title: Comparative evaluation of acrosomal integrity of bull spermatozoa by two staining techniques

Authors: Nadeem Shah, HP Yadav, RK Gupta, DS Chauhan, Vijay Singh, Sarvajeet Yadav and DK Swain

Source: Ruminant Science (2016)-5(2):253-256.

Cite this reference as: Shah Nadeem, Yadav HP, Gupta RK, Chauhan DS, Singh Vijay, Yadav Sarvajeet and Swain DK (2016). Comparative evaluation of acrosomal integrity of bull spermatozoa by two staining techniques. Ruminant Science 5(2):253-256.

 

Abstract

Present study evaluated the variations existing between the techniques of evaluation of acrosomal integrity in bull spermatozoa. Acrosomal integrity was evaluated in forty ejaculates collected from four Haraina bulls using traditional Giemsa staining (n=20) and fluorescent FITC-PSA labeling (n=20). Evaluation of intact acrosome and damaged acrosome

followed by different types of acrosomal damage (primary, secondary and tertiary) were carried out using these techniques. Results revealed that FITC-PSA labeling technique is better as compared to Giemsa in evaluation of intact as well different types of acrosomal damage. Simultaneously, we noted significantly better analysis of acrosomal intactness on Poly-L-Lysine coated slides as compared to general glass slides. The ease of preparation of smears and their evaluation was better on Poly-L-Lysine coated slides as compared to general glass slides. From the study, it was concluded that, evaluation of spermatozoa for identification of different types of acrosomal damage may be preferred to be evaluated by FITC-PSA as compared to Giemsa and Poly-L-Lysine coated slides may be preferred for better analysis of results. The study is beneficial to the scientific community in terms of staining as well as better interpretation of acrosomal status in animals.

References

Brito LFC, Barth AD, Bilodeau-Goessels S, Panich PL and Kastelic JP (2003). Comparison of methods to evaluate the plasmalemma of bovine sperm and their relationship with in vitro fertilization rate. Theriogenology 60:1539-1551.

Gadea J (2005). Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility. Theriogenology 63: 431-444.

Hironori S, Masanori K and Makoto T (2012). Adhesion of tissue sections from eleven organs on glass slides with amino group coatings. Journal of Bioscience Bioengineering 113(5):661-664.

Husain OA, Millet JA and Grainger JM (1980). Use of polylysine coated slides in preparation of cell samples for diagnostic cytology with special reference to urine sample. Journal of Clinical Pathology 33(3):309 311.

Kumar A, Swain DK, Kumar T, Kumar J, Yadav S and Pandey V (2013). Effect of age and season on acrosomal integrity of barbari buck sperm. Ruminant Science 2(2):163-166.

Swain DK, Swarnkar P, Kumar J and Yadav S (2012). Evaluation of in vitro longevity of caprine cauda epididymal sperm at different storage intervals of time. Indian Journal of Animal Science 82:1347-1350.

Swain DK, Yadav S and Singh SK (2017). Effect of four different in vitro incubation temperatures on functionaldynamics, process of capacitation and apoptosis in goat spermatozoa. Small Ruminant Research 147:120-124.

Watson PF (1975). Use of Giemsa stain to detect changes in acrosomes of frozen ram spermatozoa. Veterinary Records 97:12-15.