Effect of feeding fish meal and rumen protected amino acids on biometry and cost of production of Murrah buffalo heifers

Effect of feeding fish meal and rumen protected amino acids on biometry and cost of production of Murrah buffalo heifers

Title: Effect of feeding fish meal and rumen protected amino acids on biometry and cost of production of Murrah buffalo heifers

Authors: Ravi Kumar, Dipankar Kar, Devender Singh Bidhan, Dipin Chander Yadav and SK Chhikara

Source: Ruminant Science (2016)-5(2):217-222.

Cite this reference as: Kumar Ravi, Kar Dipankar, Bidhan Devender Singh, Yadav Dipin Chander and Chhikara SK (2016). Effect of feeding fish meal and rumen protected amino acids on biometry and cost of production of Murrah buffalo heifers. Ruminant Science 5(2):217-222.

Abstract

The present study attempted to analyze the effect of feeding fish meal and rumen protected amino acids on growth parameters of Murrah buffalo heifers. Eighteen Murrah buffalo heifers were randomly distributed into three treatment groups each having six heifers. Animals in treatment T1 (control group) were, fed with conventional ration, in T2 (fish meal supplementation by replacing conventional concentrate) and in T3 (with 10g commercial bypass Lysine per animal per day + 2g commercial bypass Methionine per animal per day) for 90 days. The amount of concentrate mixture was given to each group in such a way that the experimental rations remain iso-proteinaceous. Body measurements of body length, height, heart girth and abdominal girth were recorded at monthly intervals. Differences in respect of gain in biometry i.e. body length, height, heart girth and abdominal girth were positive and higher in T2 and T3 treatments than that of T1, but the changes were non-significant. Prices of feeds and fodder, prevailing at the time of purchase were collected. On the basis of price, total expenditure incurred on feeding of various experimental groups was calculated. Cost of feeding per kg body weight gain was also computed for different treatments. Total cost of feeding per animal was higher in T2 and T3 treatments than that of T1. However, mean cost of feeding (Rs. per kg gain) was much lower in T2 treatment group fed with fish meal.

References

Alam MS, Rashi MH, Uddin ME and Asaduzzaman M (2012). Effect of supplementation of fish meal on growth and reproductive performance of crossbred heifers. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University 10(2):261-266.

AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. 18th Edn. Association of official analytical chemists. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

Archibeque SI, Burns JC and Huntington GB (2002). Nitrogen metabolism of beef steers fed endophyte-free tall fescue hay: Effect of ruminally protected Methionine supplementation. Journal of Animal Science 80:1344-1351.

Arewad GR, Thube HA, Pandya PR, Parnerkar S and Shankhpal S (2011). Effect of feeding bypass protein based total mixed ration on Performance of growing crossbred calves. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 28(3):303-308.

Blauwiekel R, Xu S and Harrison JH (1992). The use of cereal grains and by-product feeds to meet the amino acid requirements of dairy cattle. In: Proceeding of 27th Pacific Northwest Animal Nutrition Conference.  Spokane, WA, pp 225-236.

Friedman M (1977). Protein Crosslinking. Springer Science and business Media, New York, p 545.

Gajera AP, Dutta KS, Savsani HH, Parsana Vataliya PH, Sipai SH and Ribadiya NK (2013). Effect of rumen protected Lysine, Methionine and fat on nutrients utilization in growing Jaffrabadi heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 30(4):351-357.

Izumi K, Kikuchi C and Okamoto M (2000). Effect of rumen protected Methionine on lactational performance of dairy cows. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 13:1235-1238.

Lall SP (1991). Digestibility, metabolism and excretion of dietary phosphorus by fish. In: CB Cowey and CY Cho (Eds), Proc, First Int symp on Nutritional Strategies in Management of Aquaculture Waste, University of Guelph, Canada. p 275.

Mercer JR, Allen SA and Miller EL (1980). Rumen bacterial protein synthesis and the proportion of dietary protein escaping degradation in the rumen of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 43:421.

Movaliya JK (2012). Effect of rumen bypass methionone

and lysine supplementation on performance of Jaffrabadi heifers. MVSc thesis submitted to JAU, Junagadh, Gujarat.

National Research Council (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Edn, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Patel GV, Bhagwat SR, Pawar MM, Prajapati KB, Ashwar BK and Sheikh AS (2015). Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, feed conversion ratio and cost of feeding in mehsana heifers fed cotton seed cake and rumen-protected methionine and lysine supplement. Ruminant Science 4(1):65-70.

Ranjhan SK (1998). Nutritional Requirement of Livestock and Poultry. 2nd Edn, Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan, Pusa, New Delhi.

Richardson CR and Hatfield EE (1978). The limiting amino acids in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 46:740-745.

Rulquin H and Delaby L (1997). Effects of the energy balance of dairy cows on lactational responses to rumen-protected Methionine. Journal of Dairy Science 80:2513-2522.

Snedecor GW and Cochran WG (1994). Statistical Methode. 8th Edn, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, New Delhi.

Zerbini E and Polan CE (1988). Protein sources evaluated for ruminating Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 68:1416-1424.