Effect of rumen protected lysine and methionine supplementation on growth and feed conversion efficiency in Jaffrabadi heifers

Effect of rumen protected lysine and methionine supplementation on growth and feed conversion efficiency in Jaffrabadi heifers

Title: Effect of rumen protected lysine and methionine supplementation on growth and feed conversion efficiency in Jaffrabadi heifers

Authors: MD Odedra, K Ravikala, KS Murthy, KS Dutta, RJ Padodara and SN Ghodasara

Source: Ruminant Science (2016)-5(2):205-209.

Cite this reference as: Odedra MD, Ravikala K, Murthy KS, Dutta KS, Padodara RJ and Ghodasara SN (2016). Effect of rumen protected lysine and methionine supplementation on growth and feed conversion efficiency in Jaffrabadi heifers. Ruminant Science 5(2):205-209.

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate incorporation of rumen protected lysine (LYS) and methionine (MET) on growth, biometry and feed conversion efficiency in Jaffrabadi buffalo heifers. Eighteen buffalo heifers were randomized and divided in to three groups of six each, received one of the following dietary treatments for a period of 180 days: T1- Protein requirement met through Concentrate mixture, T2-Protein requirement met through cottonseed cake and concentrate mixture (50:50) and T3-In addition to protein requirement through concentrate mixture, rumen bypass LYS and MET @ 5.0 g and 2.5 g /day/animal were supplemented. Heifers of T3 group gained significantly (p<0.05) higher body weight and ADG. Overall increase in height at withers, heart girth and body length was linear and positive throughout the experiment. Period and treatment had no effect on the pelvic girdle (cm) measurements in buffalo heifers. Overall dry matter intake (g/kg W0.75) was 112.45 ±0.47, 115.36±0.13 and 111.71±0.15 with mean feed conversion efficiency for the entire experimental period was 17.22±2.13, 16.34±0.77 and 15.22 ±0.63 (DMI kg/kg gain) for three groups respectively. Thus indicated improvement in growth performance of Jaffrabadi heifers when supplemented rumen protected LYS and MET over and above the requirement.

References

Anonymous (2011). Annual Progress Report. Cattle Breeding Farm JAU, Junagadh, India.

AOAC (1999). Official Method of Analysis. 18th Edn, Association of Official analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

Arora SP and Gupta BS (1962). Growth rate of Murrah buffalo calves. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Research (Mhow) 5:1-4.

Bhatti SA, Sarwar M, Khan MS and Hussain SM (2007). Reducing the age at first calving through nutritional manipulations in dairy buffaloes and cows. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 27(1):42-47.

 Chow JM,  DePeters EJ and  Baldwin RL (1990). Effect of rumen-protected methionine and lysine on casein in milk when diets high in fat or concentrate are fed. Journal of Dairy Science  73(4):1051-1061.

Dahiya SS, Chandersekriah S, Sharma ML, Thulsi A, Punia BS and Sampath KT (2007).  Effects of limiting amino acid rich supplements in the ration on nutrient utilization and milk production of buffaloes in early lactation. Tropnutricon Compendium II International Tropical Animal Nutrition Conference. October 4-7, 2007 National Dairy Research Institute Karnal, India.

ICAR (1998). Nutrient Requirement for Livestock and Poultry. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi.

Jat HR, Chaudhary JL and Bugalia HL (2005). Effect of feeding cottonseed on the body measurements and feed conversion efficiency in growing buffalo heifers. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 58(3):198-200.

Kalbande VH and Chainpure AH (2001). Effect of feeding bypass protein with urea treated jowar kadbi on performance of cross bred calves. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 14:651-654. 

Mandal GP, Kurar CK and Kewalramani N (2002). Effect of methionine and lysine supplementation on dry matter intake, nutrition utilization and growth in buffalo calves.  Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 2(1):39-47.

Mehla OP, Yadav RS and Kumar N (2005). Effect of source of protein and feeding frequency on nutrients and water intake of Murrah buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Animal Research 39(1):57-59.

Patel GV, Bhagwat SR, Pawar MM, Prajapati KB, Ashwar BK and Sheikh AS (2015). Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, feed conversion ratio and cost of feeding in mehsana heifers fed cotton seed cake and rumen-protected methionine and lysine supplement. Ruminant Science 4(1):65-70.

Snedecor GW and Cochran WG (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn, Affiliated East-West Press Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Talapatra SK, Ray SC and Sen KC (1940). Estimation of phosphorus and potassium in food stuffs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 10:243

Tandon M, Siddique RA and Ambwani T (2008). Role of bypass proteins in ruminant production. Dairy Planner 4(10):11-14.

Parnerkar SG and Kore KB (2012). Effect of feeding bypass nutrients to growing buffalo heifers under field conditions. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24:2.

Influence of genetic and non-genetic factors on growth performance of Sonadi sheep

Influence of genetic and non-genetic factors on growth performance of Sonadi sheep

Title: Influence of genetic and non-genetic factors on growth performance of Sonadi sheep

Authors: PC Sharma, Barkha Gupta, Monika Joshi, Tarun Preet, S Pareek, NS Rathore and RK Nagda

Source: Ruminant Science (2016)-5(2):165-167.

Cite this reference as: Sharma PC, Gupta Barkha, Joshi Monika, Preet Tarun, Pareek S, Rathore NS and Nagda RK (2016). Influence of genetic and non-genetic factors on growth performance of Sonadi sheep. Ruminant Science 5(2):165-167.

Abstract

A study was carried out to assess the effect of non genetic factors on growth performance of Sonadi sheep. The overall least squares means for BWT, 3WT, 6WT and ADG1 and ADG2 were estimated as 2.61±0.01 kg, 9.21±0.13 kg, 13.13±0.16 kg, 74.01±1.41 gm and 43.70±1.29 gm, respectively. Effect of season of birth and period was significant (P< 0.05) on growth traits (3WT, 6WT and ADG2). Sex of lamb showed significant (P<0.05) effect for birth weight, three month of body weight due to physiological functions. Birth weight showed increasing trend over the period.

References

Chopra A, Prince LLL, Gowane GR and Arora AL (2010). Influence of genetic and non genetic factors on growth profile of Bharat Merino sheep in semi-arid region of Rajasthan Indian journal of Animal science 80 (4) : 376-78

Harvey  RW (1990). User’s Guide for LSMLMW. Mixed Model Least squares and Maximum Likelihood Computer Programme, PC-2 version. Ohio State University (Mimeograph) USA

Jain  A,  Singh G, Arora A and Bhatia S (2006). Sheep Genetic Resources of India. Monograph NBAGR Karnal, India.  40:1-19

Nehra  KS and Singh VK (2006). Genetic evaluation of Marwari sheep in arid zone : Growth.  Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 12(1):91-94.

Prakash V, Prince LLL, Gowane GR and Arora AL (2010). Factors affecting post weaning average daily gain and Kleiber ratios in Malpura sheep Indian journal of Animal science 82(12):1598-1600

Tailor SP (2012). Sonadi Sheep in their breeding tract. Indian Journal of Animal Science 82(7):767-769