11-Title: DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY SERVICES AVAILABLE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT OF DAIRY FARMERS
Authors: Harsh Dabas, Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Amit Singh and Pratikshya Panda
Source: Ruminant Science (2025)-14(2):165-170.

Abstract

How to cite this manuscript: Harsh Dabas, Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Amit Singh and Pratikshya Panda (2025). Department of animal husbandry services available for reproductive health management of dairy farmers. Ruminant Science 14(2):165-170.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to explore the knowledge, practices, and attitudes of dairy farmers toward reproductive health management (RHM) in Mathura district, Uttar Pradesh. Using a multistage sampling method, data were collected from 120 farmers through structured interviews and analysed with SPSS. Key areas examined included farmers’ socioeconomic profiles, awareness of RHM, use of indigenous versus modern methods, and constraints in accessing services. Findings showed that middle-aged men predominantly managed cattle reproduction, while women’s involvement was limited. Artificial insemination (AI) was widely used, yet oestrus detection mostly relied on observational family methods rather than scientific tools, raising concerns about accuracy. Farmers addressed issues like ketosis, mastitis, and metritis through a mix of clinical and traditional remedies, reflecting a hybrid approach shaped by accessibility and cultural norms. Challenges to effective RHM included financial barriers, limited veterinary access, lack of training, and weak government outreach. While AI and pregnancy diagnosis were common, services like reproductive counselling remained underutilised due to low awareness and trust. The study highlights the need for improved rural veterinary infrastructure, subsidised AI and medicines, and gender-inclusive training to boost women’s participation. Integrating indigenous knowledge with modern reproductive technologies could enhance acceptance and outcomes. A multi-stakeholder approach involving farmers, vets, policymakers, and NGOs is essential to address systemic gaps. Additionally, digital platforms and mobile advisory services can bridge knowledge and service delivery divides, particularly in remote areas. Strengthening RHM practices promises to enhance milk production, animal welfare, and farmer livelihoods, contributing to broader rural development goals.
References
Anilkumar K, Radhika G, Simon SE and Aravindakshan TV (2020). Evaluation of contributions of ICAR- field progeny testing scheme towards genetic improvement of crossbred cattle of Kerala. Ruminant Science 9(2):291-296.
Bhan A (2023). Adoption of artificial insemination among dairy farmers: A regional perspective. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 93(1):45-52.
Bó GA, Baruselli PS and Mapletoft RJ (2019). Synchronization techniques to increase fertility using artificial insemination and embryo transfer in cattle. Animal Reproduction 16(3):476-483.
Britt JH, Cushman RA, Dechow CD Dobson H, Humblot P, Hutjens MF and Sheldon IM (2018). Learning from the future-A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067. Journal of Dairy Science 101(5):3722-3741.
Butler WR (2018). Nutritional interactions with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 60-61.
Capper JL and Cady RA (2020). The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science 88(6):2160-2168.
Chauhan R (2022). Impact of farmer knowledge on reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle. Veterinary World 15(2):267-273.
Gherissi Djalel Eddine, Ferag Aziza, Kechroud Ahmed Abdelouahed, Bordja Nadjat and Daia Mohamed El Haddi (2025). Survey on medication usage in retained placenta, acute puerperal metritis and chronic endometritis of dairy cattle. Ruminant Science 14(1):81-92.
Choudhury S, Das A and Sahu R (2021). Cultural perspectives in reproductive health practices among Indian dairy farmers. Journal of Ethnoveterinary Practices 13(4):211-217.
Derdour Salima-Yamina, Mimoune Nora, Laamari Abdelouahab, Saboundji Imad Eddine, Hamadouche Abdelkadir, Khelef Djamel and Kaidi Rachid (2022). Study on factors influencing the success of AI according to the inseminators. Ruminant Science 11(1):21-24.
Ghosh R, Das K and Sharma S (2023). Fertility testing and reproductive health monitoring in smallholder dairy herds. Indian Journal of Veterinary Research 62(1):33-39.
Givens MD and Marley MSD (2020). Infectious causes of embryonic and fetal mortality. Theriogenology 150:150-160.
Gurjar Devkishan, Gujar Gayatri, Gurjar ML, Sharma MC and Meel Padma (2021). Insights into the buffalo breeding and milking practices in relation to herd size adopted by farmers in the non-tribal area of Chittorgarh district in Rajasthan. Ruminant Science 10(2):423-428.
Jain M (2022). Reproductive health counseling: Awareness and adoption among dairy farmers. Journal of Rural Extension 18(1):55-60.
Kumar A (2022). Fertility diagnostics and reproductive efficiency in dairy animals. Indian Veterinary Journal 99(4):42-47.
Kumar R (2023). Role of farmer training in enhancing reproductive health management in dairy farms. Journal of Dairy and Veterinary Sciences 11(2):101-108.
Madhusudhan M (2021). Economic barriers in accessing reproductive services among rural dairy farmers. Agricultural Economics Review 35(3):49-56.
Madushanka DNN, Padmakumara HMS, Kumarasinghe GDN, Sanjeewa MPK and Magamage MPS (2017). Effect of two different bedding systems on udder health management of dairy cows. Ruminant Science 6(1):1-6.
Mishra A (2022). Cultural beliefs and the resistance to artificial insemination. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 92(3):76-81.
Mishra P, Yadav R and Sharma N (2023). Government intervention in reproductive health technologies for smallholder dairy farms. Livestock Policy and Development 9(1):18-25.
Patel H (2022). Practices and barriers in pregnancy diagnosis and calving interval management. Journal of Dairy Extension 24(2):87-93.
Rana V (2023). The role of mobile veterinary services in enhancing reproductive health. Journal of Veterinary Field Services 14(2):101-106.
Rao D (2022). Strengthening rural veterinary services through local training programs. Veterinary Outreach Journal 7(3):59-66.
Rao R (2023). Resource allocation and reproductive health management in large dairy herds. Indian Journal of Dairy Technology 18(1):22-29.
Rathore A (2023). Technological adoption in large-scale dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Herd Management 20(4):88-95.
Reddy P (2022). Financial constraints in reproductive health interventions in dairy farming. Agricultural Finance Review 18(3):75-82.
Saini S (2022). Timely treatment of reproductive disorders: An economic perspective. Veterinary Economics and Health Management 10(2):34-40.
Sharma K (2022). Management challenges in large dairy herds. Journal of Livestock Management 17(3):115-121.
Singh A (2022). Barriers to AI service adoption in rural India. Journal of Agricultural Extension 30(1):44-50.
Singh Narendra, Sharma NK, Rajput DS, Mishra Pankaj and Dhawal KK (2020). Adoption of scientific management practices among buffalo owners in Bharatpur district of Rajasthan. Ruminant Science 9(2):323-328.
Singh R (2023). Expanding veterinary service accessibility: A rural perspective. Journal of Veterinary Public Health 11(1):65-72.
Singodia Manisha, Rewani Sanjay Kumar, Rajput Devi Singh and Tak Lokesh (2021). Health services availed by livestock farmers in Jaipur district of Rajasthan. Ruminant Science 10(1):133-138.
Smith J, Collins R and Patel D (2022). Factors influencing adoption of reproductive technologies in dairy farming. Journal of Animal Reproduction Science 93(2):201-208.
Thakur Devesh and Chander Mahesh (2016). Sharing livestock related information through whatsapp among livestock owners: An appraisal. Ruminant Science 5(2):267-270.
Verma N (2023). Economic assessment of fertility services in smallholder dairy systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1):61-68.
Vishwanath R (2020). Improving dairy reproduction through biotechnology. International Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 5(2):121-128.