Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, feed conversion ratio and cost of feeding in Mehsana heifers fed cotton

16-Title: Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, feed conversion ratio and cost of feeding in Mehsana heifers fed cotton seed cake and rumen-protected methionine and lysine supplement

Authors: GV Patel, SR Bhagwat, MM Pawar, KB Prajapati, BK Ashwar and AS Sheikh

Source: Ruminant Science (2015)-4(1):65-70.

How to cite this manuscript: Patel GV, Bhagwat SR, Pawar MM, Prajapati KB, Ashwar BK and Sheikh AS (2015). Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, feed conversion ratio and cost of feeding in Mehsana heifers fed cotton seed cake and rumen-protected methionine and lysine supplement. Ruminant Science 4(1):65-70.


The experiment was conducted to study the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, feed conversion ratio and cost of feeding in Mehsana heifers fed cotton seed cake and rumen-protected methionine and lysine supplement. Eighteen growing Mehsana heifers were fed experimental diets in three groups of six animals each for a period of 90-d. The diets were T1: concentrate mixture + maize fodder + bajra grass hay; T2: concentrate mixture and cotton seed cake (CSC) [50:50] + maize fodder + bajra grass hay and T3: Treatment-1 + Supplementation of rumen-protected methionine (MetiPEARL: containing 45% methionine) and lysine (LysiPEARL: containing 50% lysine) in concentrate mixture at the rate of 5 and 10 g/h/d, respectively. The fortnightly body weight changes and average daily body weight gain did not differ (P>0.05) among the treatment groups. However, overall changes in body weight and average daily gain were significantly (P<0.05) higher in T3 group than the T1 group and comparable to both in T2 group. The overall DM intake was significantly (P<0.05) higher in T3 group than T2 and T1 groups; but, the intakes digestible crude protein and total digestible nutrients were similar among the treatment groups. The apparent total tract digestibility of DM, CP, EE, NDF and ADF did not differ among the treatment groups. The feed conversion ratio was significantly (P<0.05) better in T3 group followed by T2 and T1 groups. The average cost of feeding (Rs./animal/day) was without any significant difference in T1, T2 and T3 groups. Results revealed that supplementation of cotton seed cake and rumen-protected methionine and lysine in Mehsana heifers resulted in better growth rate, feed intake and feed conversion ratio, but nutrient digestibility and cost of feeding were unaffected.


Agrawal DK, Singh P, Chakrabarty M, Shaikh AJ and Gayal SG (2003). Cotton seed oil quality utilization and processing. CICR Technical Bulletin No. 25.

Ali CS, Din I, Sharif M, Nisa M, Javaid A, Hashmi N and Sarwar M (2009). Supplementation of ruminally protected proteins and amino acids: feed consumption, digestion and performance of cattle and sheep. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 11:477-482.

AOAC (1995). Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Edn, Washington, DC, USA.

Čermakova J, Kudrna V, Illek J, Blažkova K and Haman J (2012). Effects of a rumen-protected form of methionine and a methionine analogue on the lactation performance of dairy cows. Czech Journal of Animal Science 57(9):410-419.

Chalupa W (1975). Rumen bypass and protection of protein and amino acids. Journal of Dairy Science 58(8):1198-1218.

Gajera AP, Dutta KS, Parsana DK, Savsani HH, Odedra MD, Gajbhiye PU, Murthy KS and Chavda JA (2013). Effect of bypass lysine, methionine and fat on growth and nutritional efficiency in growing Jaffrabadi heifers. Veterinary World 6(10):766-769.

Hussein HS and Berger LL (1995). Feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of Holstein steers as affected by source of dietary protein and level of ruminally protected lysine and methionine. Journal of Animal Science 73:3503-3509.

ICAR (1998). Nutrient requirement for livestock and poultry. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi.

Jat HR, Chaudhary JL and Bugalia HL (2005). Effect of feeding cottonseed on the body measurements and feed conversion efficiency in growing buffalo heifers. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 58(3):198-200.

Krober TF, Sutter F, Senn M, Langhans W and Kreuzer M (2001). Effects of supplying leucine and methionine to early-lactating cows fed silage-concentrate based diets with a calculated deficiency in leucine and methionine. Animal Research 50:5-20.

Leonardi C, Stevenson M and Armentano LE (2003). Effect of two levels of crude protein and methionine supplementation on performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86:4033-4042.

Mandal GP, Kurar CK and Kewalramani N (2002). Effect of methionine and lysine supplementation on dry matter intake, nutrition utilization and growth in buffalo calves. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 2(1):39-47.

Movaliya JK, Dutta KS, Savsani HH, Gadariya MR, Murthy KS and Bhadaniya AR (2013). Growth performance, nutrient utilization and economics of feeding bypass methionine and lysine in Jaffrabadi heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 30(2):124-127.

NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 7th Edn, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Odedra MD (2013). Nutritional management by feeding protected lysine and methionine on growth, hematological and hormonal profile of Jaffrabadi buffalo heifers. PhD thesis submitted to Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, India.

Patel VR, Gupta RS and Jani VR (2009). Effect of feeding bypass protein on growth and feed intake in buffalo heifer calves under field condition. In: Proceedings of Animal Nutrition Association World Conference, 14-17 Feb, New Delhi, Inida, p 25.

Qiang Y, Qi-yu D, Yan T, Nai-feng Z, Jianhong W and Meng Z (2011). Effects of dietary lysine to methionine ratio on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and metabolism in weaned calves. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 44(1):133-142.

Samuelson DJ, Denise SK, Roffler R, Ax RL, Armstrong DV and Romagnolo DF (2001). Response of Holstein and Brown Swiss cows fed alfalfa hay-based diets to supplemental methionine at two stages of lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 84:917-928.

Snedecor GW and Cochran WG (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn, Affiliated East-West Press Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

SPSS (1999). Statistical Packages for Social Sciences, Base 16.0 for Windows User’s Guide. SPSS Inc, Chicago IL, USA.

Titi HH, Azzam SI and Alnimer MA (2013). Effect of protected methionine supplementation on milk production and reproduction in first calf heifers. Archiv Tierzucht 56(22):225-236.

Vahora SG, Parnerkar S and Kore KB (2012). Effect of the feeding bypass nutrients to growing buffalo heifers under field conditions. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24(2):39.

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB and Lewis BA (1991). Methods for dietary fire neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3583-3597.

Wilkerson VA, Klopfenstein TJ, Britton RA, Stock RA and Miller PS (1993). Metabolizable protein and amino acid requirements of growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 71:2777-2784.