Ultrasonographic evaluation of teats in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)

Ultrasonographic evaluation of teats in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)

Title: Ultrasonographic evaluation of teats in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)

Authors: Pramod Singh, S Purohit and RP Pandey

Source: Ruminant Science (2017)-6(2):377-381.

Cite this reference as: Singh P, Purohit S and Pandey RP (2017). Ultrasonographic evaluation of teats in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Ruminant Science 6(2):377-381.

Abstract

Ultrasonographic evaluations of teats were performed in 18 adult buffaloes. Animals were divided in three groups viz. dry, lactating and unhealthy group each contain six buffaloes. Teat length and diameter were measured by using scale and vernier calliper, respectively. Teats were dipped into a plastic glass filled with water at room temperature and probe was placed on the wall of the plastic glass using ultrasound gel for better ultrasonographic visualization. Teat canal length, teat end width, teat wall thickness and teat cistern width were measured sonographically in front and rear teats of dry, lactating and unhealthy buffaloes, respectively. Sonographic teat dimensions are established for future reference and clinical use.

References

Abshenas J, Vosough D, Masoudifard M and Molai MM (2007) B-mode ultrasonography of the udder and teat in camel. Journal of Veterinary Research 62(2):27-31.

Ambord S and Bruckmaier RM (2010). Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: Effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition. Journal of Dairy Science 93(8):3588-3594.

Amin NR, Patil DB, Kelawala DN, Parikh PV, Mer DR, Gameti KS and Gohil KM (2017). Ultrasonography of udder and teat in dairy animals. Ruminant Science 6(1):173-177.

Ayadi M, Caja G, Such X and Knight CH (2003). Use of ultrasonography to estimate cistern size and milk storage at different milking intervals in the udder of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 70:1-7.

Celik HA, Aydin I, Colak M, Sendag S and Dinc DA (2008). Ultrasonographic evaluation of age related influence on the teat canal and the effect of this influence on milk yield in Brown Swiss cows. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 52:245-249.

Chrystal MA, Seykora AJ, Hansen LB, Freeman AE, Kelley DH and Healey MH (2001). Heritability of teat-end shape and the relationship of teat-end shape with somatic cell score for an experimental herd of cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84:2549-2554.

Dhingra P, Pander BL, Dhaka SS, Sharma A and Magotra A (2016). Genotypic evaluation of somatic cell count in Hardhenu cattle (Bos taurus x Bos indicus). Ruminant Science 5(1):5-10.

Flock M, Klein D and Hofmann-Parisot M (2004). Ultrasonographic findings of pathological teat changes in cattle. Wiener Tierarztliche Monatsschrift 91:184-195.

Franz S, Hofmann-Parisot M and Baumgartner W, Windischbauer G, Suchy A and Bauder B (2001). Ultrasonography of the teat canal in cows and sheep. Veterinary Record 149:109-112.

Gleeson DE, O’Callaghan EJ and Rath MV (2002). Effect of milking on bovine teat tissue as measured by ultrasonography. Irish Veterinary Journal 55:628-632.

Haghkhah M, Ahmadi MR, Gheisari HR and Kadiver A (2011). Preliminory bacterial study on subclinical mastitis and teat condition in dairy herds around Shiraz. Turkey Journal Veterinary Animal Science 35(6):387-394.

Hamann J, Mein GA and Wetzel S (1993). Teat tissue reactions to milking- effects of vacuum level. Journal of Dairy Science 76:1040-1046.

Hamann J and Mein GA (1995). Dynamic tests for reaction of the teat. Proceedings of the 3rd  IDF International Mastitis Seminar : Tel-Aviv, Israel 2(2):35-40.

Klein D, Flock M, Khol JL, Franz S, Stuger HP and Baumgartner W (2005). Ultrasonographic measurement of the bovine teat: Breed differences, and the significance of the measurements for udder health. Journal of Dairy Research 72:296-302.

Michel G (1986). Gesichtspunkte der funktionellen Morphologie der Rinderzitze. Veterinarni Medicina 41:77-80 

Neijenhuis F, Klungel GH and  Hogeveen H (2001). Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. Journal  of Dairy Science 84:2599-2606.

O’Shea J, O’Callaghan EJ and Meaney S (1987). Machine milking factors affecting mastitis-A literature of the bovine udder and teat. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 188:1284-1287.

Paøilova M, Stadnik L, Jezkova A and Štolc L (2011). Effect of milking vacuum level and overmilking on cows’ teat characteristics. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunenisis 59(5):193-202.

Porcionato MADF, Soares WVB, Reis CBMD, Cortinhas CS, Mestieri L and Santos MVD (2010). Milk flow, teat morphology and subclinical mastitis prevalence in Gir cows. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 45(12):1507-1512.

Rogers GW and Spencer SB (1991). Relationship among udder and teat morphology and milking characteristic. Journal of Dairy Science 74:4189-4194.

Seyfried G (1992). Die sonographishe messing von zitzenstrukturen und deren bedeutung fur die eutergesundheit beim braun-und fleckvieh.  Veterinary Medicine Disseratation . Veteterinary University Vienna Wien.

Snedecor GW and Cocharn WG (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn, Iowa State University Press, USA.

Spanu C, Reinemann DJ, Momont H, Cook N, Ruegg PL and Bade RD (2008). Ultrasonic assessment of teat tissue congestion. Paper No. 083805, ASABE Annual International Meeting.

Weiss D, Weinffurtner M and Bruckmair RM (2004). Teat anatomy and its relationship with quarter and milk flow characteristics in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87:3280-3289.